IS PINTARD CUCKOO?

Our country leaders must be of sound mind, with integrity and a heart for the people. They should not be arrogant, narrow-minded, petty, or have low self-esteem. Politicians should have broad shoulders and thick alligator skin to withstand the rigours of a campaign, debate, and everyday life.

We could speak of our past leaders who have come and gone; they all possess the mettle for the position. We can talk about some who made a difference while having the reputation of being assertive and having a strong personality. They were people-friendly and could be approached, not thin-skinned. Broad shoulders must be an asset if one is to be successful with people.

Michael Pintard in the House of Assembly has recently been strange. He is paranoid of the footsteps behind him and does not trust his shadow. He has exhibited unprecedented childishness, often resorting to personal attacks and unwarranted name-calling, particularly towards the sitting Member for Cat Island, Rum Cay and San Salvador. These actions have derailed the debate that should have gone on normally, and he seems hellbent on embarrassing PM Davis.

There have been some concerns about how he conducts business in the party, especially for members of the Free National Movement. His ‘one-person band approach’, where he makes decisions unilaterally without consulting other party members, and ‘mission to wreck the party’, where he seems more focused on undermining the current government leadership than on the party’s success, have led to a significant loss of support and a lack of recognition for the party’s original values. His disrespect for the many former Members of Parliament is evident, and the party is now only a shell of its former self.

The most unqualified Bahamian is questioning whether all is well with Pintard. His erratic behaviour and inability to maintain his cool have caused great concern. Some are even saying that the pattern of behaviour is akin to bipolar and may even point to a more severe mental challenge. We cannot forget his mysterious resignation from the Senate and as party chairperson. It is unfathomable, and the jury is still out on how he could be leading a political party, unless they are desperate after being allegedly tied to a “murder for hire” plot.

The million-dollar question is, does Michael Pintard’s behaviour indicate a potential mental condition? As concerned citizens, we have every right to ask. If this is the case, it raises serious concerns about his ability to lead the country. We cannot afford an unstable leader who may ‘trip out’ when dealing with world leaders and international potential investors. Our right to question is not just a privilege, but a duty to ensure the best leadership for our country.

The recent handling of the much-anticipated rollout of the first seventeen candidates, with Pintard’s fingerprints all over it, has raised chaos that could be his Waterloo. With an election looming, the Free National Movement may accept who Michael Pintard is. However, the Bahamian voting public must consider whether he has the mental capacity to lead the country. We need a leader who can represent us professionally, not one who might ‘trip out’ when dealing with world leaders and international potential investors. Our country’s reputation is at stake, and we must be vigilant in our leadership choice.

Curious minds are eager for answers, and the unsuspecting Bahamian voter has a right to be informed. The public’s right to know about Pintard’s mental health is not just a matter of curiosity, but a responsibility we all share as citizens of this nation.

Post Views: 408