Justice of the Peace Is a Responsibility, Not a Commodity

The growing number of courses exploiting people who seek to become a Justice of the Peace has caused unnecessary anxiety and confusion. A Justice of the Peace is far more than a prestigious title to be displayed or leveraged for social standing. Yet, increasingly, the role is being marketed in ways that suggest personal advantage rather than public responsibility.

There is a psychological dimension to this misuse of the title. Some individuals flaunt their status as a JP as though it grants them superiority or influence in society, fundamentally misunderstanding the role’s original intent.

A Justice of the Peace should be an upstanding, well-known member of the community—someone recognized for helping others, showing empathy, and living a life of service. A genuine contribution to the community should be the first and most important qualification. It is not a business opportunity, nor a status symbol, but a commitment to the public good.

The role requires maturity, sound judgment, and emotional sobriety. A JP may be called upon to sign affidavits, warrants, or marriage licenses, and in some cases perform marriages. These responsibilities demand integrity, discretion, and a deep respect for the law and the people it serves.

Those who exploit the anxiety of vulnerable individuals by charging exorbitant fees, falsely implying that completing a course guarantees licensure, or suggesting that the title alone provides social leverage are acting disingenuously. Such practices mislead applicants and cheapen the dignity of the office.

Taking advantage of people seeking legitimacy or purpose under the guise of “qualification” is unethical. Those who profit from this deception are not educators or mentors, but opportunists preying on vulnerability.